Events
Live Music: Licensed To Thrill?
- Date:
- Oct 13, 2009 from 18:30 to 21:30
- Venue:
- The Basement, PRS for Music, Copyright House, 29-33 Berners Street, London, W1T 3AB
- Location:
- Nearest Tube - Goodge St (Northern Line). PRS for Music is at Mortimer St end of Berners St.
POST-EVENT PRESS COVERAGE:
Billboard 14.10.09 | http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3ibadf593c28401ee83cf83024591e52db
The Guardian 15.10.09 | http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/oct/15/small-venues-struggle-live-music
The Publican 15.10.09 | http://www.thepublican.com/story.asp?sectioncode=7&storycode=65462
Morning Advertiser 15.10.09 | http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/news.ma/article/84722?Ntt=MusicTank&Ntk=All&PagingData=Po_0~Ps_10~Psd_Asc
POST-EVENT TV COVERAGE:
Continuing the themes of MusicTank's recent Licensing Act debate, BBC 1's Inside Out programme has covered both Form 696 issues (19.10.09) and more recently, noise abatement (02.11.09) featuring MusicTank keynote speaker, Kent Davis.
Separately, BBC1's One Show has further covered Licensing Act issues around small venue exemption, (02.11.09).
You can catch up on these here - bbc iPlayer links are time sensitive and may have expired...
BBC1 Inside Out West Midlands - 02.11.09 - NOISE ABATEMENT -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00nrxtl/Inside_Out_West_Midlands_02_11_2009/
BBC 1 One Show - 02.11.09 - STING ON THE LICENSING ACT
(features Sting commenting on Government Policy Live Music policy regarding the Licensing Act at 5'46" into the programme)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00nq9sk/The_One_Show_02_11_2009/
EVENT ARCHIVE: Scroll down for to access the transcript for Panel 1: The Licensing Act & Form 696. Part 2 will follow shortly. MusicTank members can access the entire MusicTank event archive and save money on all MusicTank events at an annual cost of just £30.
Interested? Sign up here...http://www.musictank.co.uk/about/membership-benefits?searchterm=membership
Please Note: All delegates will receive a free, post-event transcript and complimentary drink on arrival.
INTRO:
Last year, revenues from live music overtook those from record sales, with £1.39billion generated from live music – up 16% on 2007 – while record sales revenues fell to £1.31billion.1
But while the live industry appears to be thriving, the voices of discontent at its roots are growing louder. In July the government rejected widely supported recommendations from the Culture Media and Sport Select Committee regarding changes to the Licensing Act of 2003. In a rare public meeting, a leading voice supporting reform of the Act and an abandonment of form 696, UK Music CEO Feargal Sharkey will face the Metropolitan Police’s head of clubs and vice, Adrian Stubbs, the officer responsible for many of the controversial measures to which the live industry appears so opposed.
As highlighted in MusicTank’s July editorial, noise abatement orders are having a destructive impact on small venues across the UK. So we’ve invited the MD of the Noise Abatement Society and the Birmingham landlord whose 2000-capacity venue has been threatened with death-by-noise-abatement-order.
Prepare for a clash of opinions, with individual livelihoods and the future of the industry at stake. This will be your chance to hear from all sides and put your own questions the key decision makers.
SPEAKERS:
NOTE: Feargal Sharkey was unfortunately struck low with Swine ‘Flu the morning of this event. We are very grateful to Lord Tim Clement-Jones, Lib Dem spokesman, DCMS for agreeing to keynote at very short notice.
| Panel 1 | THE LICENSING ACT & FORM 696 |
|
| KEYNOTE 1: |
Feargal Sharkey |
CEO, UK Music |
| KEYNOTE 2: | Adrian Studd | Chief Inspector, Metropolitan Police |
| Diane Baxter | National Organiser - Live Performance & Teaching, Musicians' Union | |
| Philip Doyle | Director, Institute of Licensing & Licensing Consultant | |
| Reg Walker |
Operations Director, Iridium Consultancy |
|
| Panel 2 | NOISE ABATEMENT | |
| KEYNOTE: | Kent Davis |
The Rainbow Pub, Digbeth |
| John King |
Musician / Independent Campaigner & report co-author * | |
| Lisa Lavia |
Managing Director, The Noise Abatement Society |
|
| Mark Du Val | Director of Policy, LACORS | |
| Dominique Czopor | The Boileroom, Guildford & Founder, we:Live | |
| Chairman: | Keith Harris | Keith Harris Music Ltd / MusicTank Chairman / PPL Director |
TOPIC:
Noise is a massive issue for residents local to music venues. Nobody, let alone those with a young family, wants to be kept up at all hours by loud music in the club across the street. In such circumstances, some say that the venue should go, others say the residents should ‘like it or lump it,’ but, rather than generate a stalemate, the session will explore amicable resolutions that allow residents to get a good night’s sleep, while giving up-and-coming acts the chance to entertain and hone their craft.
In the Digbeth area of Birmingham particularly, noise abatement orders have been a common subject of news and conflict. When the Abacus apartments opened next door to The Spotted Dog, a pub that has put on live music outdoors for over 22 years, three complaints of noise were made and a noise abatement order subsequently issued by Birmingham City Council. This reduced the venue’s ability to continue as a business and robbed residents who had moved into Abacus for the local music scene of a key reason they moved to the area.
More recently, The Rainbow pub, a music venue further down the road in Digbeth, received one complaint before being threatened with a noise abatement order. Despite offering to replace their roof with a £30,000 soundproof top and over 22,000 supporters, the venue was issued with its noise abatement order – constricting its ability to raise the required funds to satisfy the complainant or continue providing an invaluable platform to artists.
Form 696 and the Culture Media and Sport Select Committee’s recommendations to the Licensing Act need less of an introduction. But with the Metropolitan Police recommending the form’s use to other forces across the UK, it seems apt to sensibly highlight the issues the form intends to prevent and the issues it causes and see what concessions can be made.
The form requires promoters at some 100-plus venues in London to provide detailed personal information to police if they want to stage a music event and has come under accusations of racial stereotyping.
UK Music CEO Fergal Sharkey said that form 696, “is a wholly unnecessary impediment to live music and has become a mandatory licensing condition on more than 70 premises in 21 London boroughs. UK Music has been vocal amongst musicians, civil liberty campaigners and members of the public who want to see this counter-productive and morally questionable risk assessment form scrapped.
“Music is a vital part of all UK culture: we should all celebrating that, free it from bureaucracy and make this country a richer and more vibrant place.”
This is a point that has been supported by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who has pinpointed creative industries as a vital part of the British economy, more important than ever in the current recession, saying that, “culture in the UK helps to define and shape and deepen our lives as individuals [and] also makes a significant contribution to our nation’s prosperity.”
This statement is backed up by the figures: music in London alone puts in excess of £1 billion into the UK economy2 and the government has pledged to increase the number of jobs in the industry too, with music industry jobs being part of a £1.1 billion investment announced in the latest budget.3
With this in mind, the problems raised by the Licensing Act become more important. UK Music and publicans argue that the act impacts on the ability for small pubs and venues to afford licences by requiring licences for the smallest live performances. They say that the time and money required to handle the bureaucracy of the process makes it impractical to get through.
As such, calls from the Select Committee to remove the needs for licenses for acoustic sets from two players or fewer and venues of under 200 were widely supported, with The Publican magazine launching its own ‘Listen Up!’ campaign to try and persuade politicians to change the licensing rules so that beleaguered landlords can attract more customers with live music. And despite a separate petition requesting licensing exemptions for small venues featuring prominently on Number 10’s website, with over 7,500 signatures4, those proposals were rejected by the Government, who argue that it would not increase the number of live music venues.
These grassroots venues are the hub of our music scene and, without them, there will be nowhere for tomorrow’s superstars to learn their craft and develop their passion. An amicable solution is paramount to our future.
Such a solution was found in Australia, where the music sector has campaigned to help venues in similar situations to the noise abatement order effected locations across the UK. Now developers of properties adjacent to existing live music venues to take responsibility for sound-proofing the apartments. Likewise, new venues opening in a residential area have to fit in with its pre-existing circumstances and can be closed for making too much noise.
In this age of promoting creativity, can a happy medium be found for developing and promoting new musical talent while safeguarding the interests and needs of the wider community?
1 'Adding up the Music Industry for 2008', Will Page, PRS for Music
2 'The Value of Music in London' from Cultural Trends 38, 2001, published by Policy Studies Institute
3 Plans for more than 5,000 new jobs in culture, music and creative industries unveiled by Andy Burnham and James Purnell, media release, here: http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/media_releases/6149.aspx
4 Downing Street Petition calling on the Prime Minister to stop using the Licensing Act to criminalise live music and to implement amendments that would exempt small gigs, here: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/livemusicevents/
* 'Licensing Act 2003 - Case Study: St Albans District Council, 2009'. This report is a study of St Albans District Council’s implementation of the Licensing Act 2003 and the impact on live music.
Event Archive
LORD TIM CLEMENT-JONES:
"Frankly, we’ve now seen over a period of quite some years, far too much red tape and local authorities interpreting the Licensing Act in so many different ways. It isn’t just a question of smaller venues or one of licensing conditions but also definitions such as incidental music and so-on, which puts a pall over live music in many ways"
"Small venue exemption for venues up to 200 people capacity has never been used because it’s so confusing and no one has been able to interpret it"
"The Government promised to do something about it in 2007 in response to Parliamentary Questions and debate, and again in 2008 and 2009. Not a dickey bird came out of it at all"
"Things are now actually worse for live music and small venues than they were in 1899 when a legal case established that a pub landlord could let customers use his piano without a licence – they were more enlightened in those days"
"Until very recently a great swathe of local authorities were insisting that form 696 was filled in as a condition of a licence at every venue for every event"
"There must be a small venue exemption that makes sense…that means music can flourish in small venues and encourage musicians. Maybe it’s a matter of genre, maybe minimally amplified rather than totally amplified, but let’s encourage and support our culture"
ADRIAN STUDD:
"It’s never been that all premises should do it [696]; it’s never been that local pubs putting on a pub band should do it"
"Risk assessment 696 is not a means to prevent live music or events from going ahead…or a means to close down venues under the Licensing Act 2003 (we have plenty of powers to close down venues)…or a means of picking on a particular type of music, event or sector of the community"
"The only way for informed decisions to be made is through the correct use of risk assessment such that the venue owner, promoter and artists understand and minimise the risks"
"There is no evidence that 696 is having a negative impact on live music, on the contrary it enables events to go ahead that might otherwise not be able to"
REG WALKER:
"I use 696 extensively and I’m disturbed that the media debate around 696 is so one-sided. I’m also disturbed that no one saw fit to consult the private security industry over amendments and how it’s put into practice"
CHRIS HODGKINS (JAZZ SERVICES):
"What it’s effectively done is to allow free screening of football in pubs without the need for a licence, no control at all, yet put onerous on musicians and those who seek work in licensed premises. It impedes the musician to seek work - a basic human right"
- Full track listing











