- This event has passed.
Follow The Money: Can The Business Of Ad-Funded Piracy Be Throttled?
28th May 2013 @ 6:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Venue: Fyvie Hall, University of Westminster
This event has now past. A short excerpt from the debate can be viewed below:Please see press and resources anchors for further coverage and follow up commentary via our blog. An extensive transcript is now available – free to members (remember to login), £19.99 for non-members. See Event transcript anchor. EVENT DETAILS For better or worse, relations with ‘Big Tech’ have defined the health of the music industry for more than a decade. And, for all the positives of online distribution, it has been a relationship personified by ideological differences, fractious lobbying and legal actions. Even as significant commercial strides have been made to develop a licensed digital market, it has been against this polarised backdrop: from one side, bemoaning antiquated licensing practices and the barriers of copyright law to ‘innovation’; and from the other, fear of technology giants playing fast and loose with IP, commoditising creativity and fueling mass infringement. Such viewpoints, the positive and negative, were neatly summarised by Beggars Group chairman Martin Mills, when accepting Billboard’s Industry Icon Award at this year’s Midem:
“Technology companies should be the partners of rights companies, not their masters,” stated Mills. “And we value them enormously as such, our partnerships with them are fundamental to our business now – as is our content to theirs.”
The value of these partnerships can also be evidenced in the wider industry – with growing revenues being generated from services like YouTube, the likes of Amazon, Netflix and Google all investing in original content, and cooperation on infrastructure projects like the Global Repertoire Database. Even debates on how to tackle infringement – for so long restricted to DMCA takedowns, ‘graduated response’ legislation and other blunt whack-a-mole instruments – have shifted somewhat, with a growing focus on the role of advertising in bankrolling unlicensed services. Arguably, the key voice in this debate has been David Lowery – singer and songwriter in acclaimed US bands Cracker and Camper Van Beethoven, and latterly lecturer at the University of Georgia. Lowery’s writings on The Trichordist blog, campaigning for an ‘Ethical Internet’, and relentless naming and shaming of corporations found to be advertising on one-click services and P2P networks, has shifted this issue centre stage. The type of piracy highlighted by Lowery and other Trichordist writers is not some romantic fantasy of rebellious teenagers sharing music and sticking it to the man; it is brand-sponsored – with advertisements for major blue chip FTSE and Fortune 500 corporations being served systematically to the most nefarious corners of the Web on an industrial scale – keeping the likes of MP3Ape and 4Shared in business, while diverting much-needed revenues from the pockets of creators. In his own words, the best approach to tackling this problem is to stop the flow of advertising dollars:
“You’re never going to shut down the cyber locker sites altogether,” he has stated, “so let’s make it hard for them to make money. It’s low-hanging fruit.”
Ironically, many tech companies, while attempting to stave off “unworkable” anti-piracy legislation, appear to be prescribing a very similar remedy. While lobbying against SOPA, Google argued that the pragmatic approach to tackling piracy was to stem sources of funding for rogue sites. “If you cut off the money flow, you cut the incentive to steal,” ran the search giant’s official statement. It was a point reiterated by Theo Bertram, Google’s UK policy manager when speaking to BBC’s Newsnight in July 2012:
“It’s not for Google to go around the web, judging what is or isn’t legal and I don’t think people would want us to,” Bertram told Rory Cellan-Jones. “Our research shows however much you do on filtering or blocking, what is much more effective is to go after the money – to remove the financial underpinnings, the advertising, the payment processes… You can be pro-freedom of expression and anti-piracy – that’s true of Google, the tech industry as a whole – the responsible players – and the music industry.”
On May 28th, MusicTank will explore this subject in some detail, considering whether it might be possible to throttle brand-sponsored piracy, even if the appetite to do so exists. The session will also examine the wider relationships between music and Big Tech and ask whether we are approaching a tipping point, away from the adversarial lobbying that typified the last decade, and towards a future based on more fruitful commercial partnerships. We are delighted to announce that David Lowery and Theo Bertram will both be key speakers at this event.
You can find resources from this event via the links below.
You can find press coverage from this event via the links below.
Dave Lowery - Singer/Songwriter & Editor in Chief, Trichordist
Alexandra Scott - Public Policy Manager, Internet Advertising Bureau UK
Theo Bertram - UK Policy Manager, Google
James Barton - Artist Manager, The Blue Team
Geoff Taylor - Chief Executive, BPI
Sam Shemtob - Associate Director, MusicTank / MD Name PR
Subscribe to the MusicTank newsletter by entering your details below:
Thank you for signing up to the MusicTank newsletter!